Como os Governos Subnacionais Contribuem para o Desenvolvimento Territorial? Uma Análise Exploratória dos Bens e Serviços Públicos Prestados pelos Governos Departamentais do Uruguai

Autores

  • Adrián Rodríguez-Miranda Universidad de la República
  • Camilo Vial Universidad Autónoma de Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59072/rper.vi75.858

Palavras-chave:

Desenvolvimento Territorial, Governos Subnacionais, Bens e Serviços Públicos, Abordagem de Métodos Mistos

Resumo

Este artigo analisa a contribuição dos governos subnacionais para o desenvolvimento territorial ao examinar a provisão de bens e serviços públicos (BSP) pelos Governos Departamentais (GD) no Uruguai. Embora executem cerca de 10% do orçamento nacional, os GD exercem responsabilidades relevantes em ordenamento do território, transporte local e atenção primária à saúde. No entanto, a sua capacidade de influenciar resultados de desenvolvimento varia significativamente entre departamentos. Com base no Índice de Desenvolvimento Regional do Uruguai (IDERE-UY), o estudo desenvolve uma metodologia piloto para avaliar a provisão local de BSP através da construção do Índice de Provisão Local de Bens e Serviços Públicos (IPL-BSP). O índice combina dois componentes: o grau de autonomia com que os GD atuam e a prioridade orçamentária atribuída às diferentes dimensões do desenvolvimento. A metodologia foi aplicada em dois estudos de caso — Rivera e San José — selecionados pelos seus níveis contrastantes de desenvolvimento. Os resultados indicam que maiores níveis de autonomia local estão associados a melhorias em indicadores de desenvolvimento territorial, especialmente em áreas como coesão social e atividade económica. As conclusões sugerem que a autonomia dos GD, mesmo com recursos limitados, pode ser um fator relevante para promover desenvolvimento territorial mais equitativo. 

Referências

Abdurrahman, B. (2023). Challenges of defining public services as the object of state administration activity. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 10(1), Article 106. https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv10n1s106

Abreu, M., Comim, F., & Jones, C. (2024). A capability approach perspective on regional development. Regional Studies, 58(11). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2276332

Alburquerque, F., Ferraro, C., & Costamagna, P. (2008). Desarrollo económico local, descentralización y democracia: Ideas para un cambio. UNSAM.

Alkire, S. (2010). Human development: Definitions, critiques, and related concepts. Human Development Research Paper (UNDP/HDRO), 2010/01.

Aroca, P., & Azzoni, C. (2021). Regional development in Latin America. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 13(4), 1094–1095.

Bakvis, H. (2021). Federalism and multilevel governance. In Handbook of public administration (pp. 147–168). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429270680-9

Bello-Gómez, R. A. (2020). Interacting capacities: The indirect national contribution to subnational service provision. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13192

Chepkorir, C., & Omwenga, J. Q. (2023). Intergovernmental relations and public service delivery in Kisii County. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 10(2), 942–959. https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i2.2643

Clark, D. A., Biggeri, M., & Frediani, A. A. (2019). The capability approach, empowerment and participation: Concepts, methods and applications. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-35230-9

Cox, K. (2020). Public goods. In International encyclopedia of human geography (2nd ed., pp. 89–93). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102295-5.10689-4

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dörffel, C., & Schuhmann, S. (2022). What is inclusive development? Introducing the multidimensional inclusiveness index. Social Indicators Research, 160, 769–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02860-y

ECLAC. (2025). Panorama del desarrollo territorial en América Latina y el Caribe 2024: Nuevas capacidades para la transformación territorial. ECLAC.

EUROSTAT. (2011). European statistics code of practice.

Ferraz, D., Mariano, E. B., Rebelatto, D., & Hartmann, D. (2020). Linking human development and the financial responsibility of regions: Combined index proposals using methods from data envelopment analysis. Social Indicators Research, 150, 439–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02338-3

Filip, D., & Setzer, R. (2025). The impact of regional institutional quality on economic growth and resilience in the EU (ECB Working Paper No. 2025/3045). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5201333

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Freigedo, M., & Goinheix, S. (2019). Análisis del nivel de autonomía de los gobiernos departamentales en Uruguay. In Descentralización en Uruguay: Propuestas para avanzar en la agenda (pp. 13–32). Fundación Konrad Adenauer.

Freigedo, M., & Goinheix, S. (2021). Local autonomy index for Uruguay.

Freigedo, M., Milanesi, A., & Bidegain, G. (2019). ¿Más descentralización, más representación? Evidencia de municipios uruguayos. Teoria e Cultura, 14(2), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.34019/2318-101x.2019.v14.14091

Freigedo, M., Milanesi, A., & Fuentes, G. (2017). Invirtiendo la secuencia: El proceso de descentralización uruguayo bajo gobiernos de izquierda (2005–2015). Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Municipales, 16, 9–36. https://doi.org/10.32457/riem.vi16.335

Garcilazo, E., & McCann, P. (2025). The case for place-based policy: Economic divergence, governance integrity and climate change mitigation. Regional Studies, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2025.2485126

Heide, M., & Heijman, W. (2019). A public good perspective on the rural environment: Theory and history. In Palgrave advances in bioeconomy: Economics and policies (pp. 131–152). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28642-2_7

Hernández, J., Vial, C., & Moller, F. (2022). Gestión pública subnacional y desarrollo territorial: Análisis de los gobiernos departamentales de Colombia. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 27(100).

Iddawela, Y., Lee, N., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2021). Quality of sub-national government and regional development in Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 57(8), 1282–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2021.1873286

Kopiński, D., Nowicki, M., & Wróblewski, M. (2023). IMF and global public goods: Seeking a new role in the global economy. Ekonomia Międzynarodowa, 42, 19–42. https://doi.org/10.18778/2082-4440.42.02

Kurian, M. (2025). Implementation and challenges of multi-level governance in the Western Balkans (Sigma Papers). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/32891a8f-en

Kyriacou, A. P., Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2017). Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: The importance of good governance. Papers in Regional Science, 94(1), 89–108.

Lutsiv, I. (2021). Doctrinal definitions of the concept of “public services”. Social & Legal Studios, 4(2), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2021-2-19-25

Midaglia, C., Castillo, M., & Freigedo, M. (2011). Mapeo de iniciativas en clave de políticas públicas. In Uruguay Integra: Aportes y reflexiones para la agenda nacional de descentralización. OPP.

Morretta, V. (2020). Territorial capital in local economic endogenous development. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12317

Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Rodríguez-Miranda, A. (2014). Descentralización fiscal, calidad de gestión de gobierno y disparidades regionales en Uruguay. Estudios de Economía, 41(2), 219–250.

Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Rodríguez-Miranda, A. (2019). Finanzas subnacionales y capacidades para el desarrollo económico territorial en Uruguay. In J. Hernández, J. Orihuela, & H. Willebald (Eds.), México y Uruguay ante la Gran Recesión. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo.

Musgrave, R. A. (1939). The voluntary exchange theory of public economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 53, 213–237.

Nijkamp, P. (2016). The resourceful region: A new conceptualisation of regional development strategies. Journal of Regional Research, 36, 191–214.

OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD & JRC European Commission.

Otero-Bahamón, S. (2020). Place-sensitive policies in the provision of subnational public goods in Colombia. Latin American Politics and Society, 62(3), 94–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2020.8

Perdomo, J., Phélan Casanova, M., & Levy-Carciente, S. (2021). Sustainable wellbeing operationalization and measurement based on the capabilities approach: The case of Latin America. Sustainability, 13(21), 12202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112202

Pérez, M. (2024). ¿Juntos a la par?: Crecimiento económico y desarrollo. Un estudio para los departamentos de Uruguay [Master’s thesis, Universidad de la República].

Rocca, I., Franco, J., & Maeso, I. (2024). Finanzas departamentales en Uruguay: Implicancias en la desigualdad y el desarrollo territorial. Documento presentado en las Jornadas de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y de Administración, Universidad de la República.

Rodríguez, J. (2024). ¿Cómo inciden las relaciones intergubernamentales en los modelos de gestión de los gobiernos subnacionales? Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 33, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.26851/rucp.33.19

Rodríguez-Miranda, A. (2014). Desarrollo económico y disparidades territoriales en Uruguay (Cuaderno 03, Serie El Futuro en Foco). PNUD.

Rodríguez-Miranda, A., & Vial, C. (2021). Medición y agenda para el desarrollo territorial en América Latina: El Índice de Desarrollo Regional LATAM. Universidad Autónoma de Chile.

Rodríguez-Miranda, A., Vial, C., & Centurión, I. (2024). Índice de desarrollo regional Uruguay. Universidad de la República.

Rodríguez-Miranda, A., Vial, C., & Parrao, A. (2021). Índice compuesto y multidimensional de desarrollo regional: Una propuesta para América Latina. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Municipales, 23(1), 1–33.

Seo, S. (2020). The economics of global-scale public goods: Key challenges and theories. In The economics of globally shared and public goods (pp. 51–80). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-819658-8.00003-2

Sen, A. (1999). Desarrollo y libertad. Planeta.

Siswidiyanto, & Sahputri, R. A. M. (2023). Decentralisation and human development in Indonesia: The importance of local government capacity in delivering development outputs and outcomes. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 21(2), 393–419. https://doi.org/10.4335/21.2.393-419(2023)

Thiel, A., Blomquist, W., & Garrick, D. E. (Eds.). (2019). Governing complexity: Analyzing and applying polycentricity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108325721

Tong, X.-Z. (2022). An exploration of Elinor Ostrom’s theory of self-governance. SHS Web of Conferences, 148, 01003. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214801003

Vázquez-Barquero, A., & Rodríguez-Cohard, J. C. (2019). Local development in a global world: Challenges and opportunities. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 11, 885–897.

Young, D. (2021). Government failure theory. In Economics for nonprofit managers and social entrepreneurs (pp. 329–348). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367696559-22

Downloads

Publicado

17-08-2026

Como Citar

Rodríguez-Miranda, A., & Vial, C. (2026). Como os Governos Subnacionais Contribuem para o Desenvolvimento Territorial? Uma Análise Exploratória dos Bens e Serviços Públicos Prestados pelos Governos Departamentais do Uruguai. RPER, (75), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.59072/rper.vi75.858